Back to Blog
Cryptomator any good5/15/2023 Sanitizer is a console tool built for troubleshooting vaults. The only real feature Cryptomator offers is Sanitizer, though it’s a lot less exciting than it sounds. The mobile apps actually offer more functionality than the desktop app, in that they integrate directly with Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive and WebDAV-based cloud storage services (read our Dropbox review and Google Drive review).Īdditionally, you can store a local copy of the encrypted information if you’re using a different cloud service, such as (read our review). That said, in a pinch, you can redownload Crytomator and still access your vaults on another computer. Simply load the file onto a USB drive, plug it into a computer and do whatever you need to do.Ĭryptomator can recognize existing vaults, but it doesn’t offer an install-less application. Like many other file encryption services, you can also run Cryptomator in a sort of “portable” mode, though it’s not as fluid as some of the paid counterparts.īoxcryptor, for example, offers an install-less application that you can run on any machine. Using Cryptomator on iOS and AndroidĬryptomator offers an iOS and Android application, as well as an installation on Linux through the console. Although neat to see, we don’t imagine many people will take advantage of this feature. If you’re an advanced user, you can also specify custom mount flags, which can change how the virtual drive is mounted. You can change where your drive is mounted, rename name it and assign it a custom mount point, but that’s about it. The settings are mostly focused on organization. Furthermore, Cryptomator can’t encrypt entire disks, which is something offered by some paid competitors. Sharing isn’t an option, and there are only a handful of settings to tinker with. MP4 Repair: How to Fix Corrupted Video Files in 2019Ĭryptomator is a focused application, and because of that, it’s light on features.Best Choice Stellar Phoenix Data Recovery.How to Create a Strong Password in 2023: Secure Password Generator & 6 Tips for Strong Passwords.How to Securely Store Passwords in 2023: Best Secure Password Storage.Best Password Manager for Small Business.How to Access the Deep Web and the Dark Net.Online Storage or Online Backup: What's The Difference?.Time Machine vs Arq vs Duplicati vs Cloudberry Backup.I’ll upload some of the larger and less sensitive data directly to Cryptomator’s vault, for the more sensitive files I will encrypt with VC first. Metadata aside, VeraCrypt uses XTS which has its flaws.Īfter some thinking (I need to stop editing posts so frequently), I think I will do both. And it’s not so obvious to me.Īlso, there are advantages to using multiple encryption services. The decision I have to make here is, whether or not that’s important to me. Anyone with access to the cloud provider’s files (and since I’d be using either Google or Dropbox, I’d assume it’s completely out in the open) would have access to metadata and know what files have been changed and how often they’re changed, thus knowing which files are probably more important than others. And as I said earlier, it leaks metadata, leading to less plausible deniability. I can understand the benefit of file-based backup, however my only concern here is that I’d be putting my trust in the hands of Cryptomator, which is an online encryption service, while VeraCrypt is offline and that’s why I trust it more. VeraCrypt has protections such as plausible deniability. I want to automate backups and syncing between devices isn’t a useful feature for me.Ĭryptomator leaks metadata, while VeraCrypt does not. What purpose does Cryptomator serve here? VC is unarguably better for local encryption than Cryptomator, but Cryptomator has cloud integration - or in other words, it automates the backup process and handles syncing - which is not what I need. I could just upload directly to Google after encrypting with VC. I’m thinking Google because it has stronger security, and privacy issues are not a problem considering I won’t be uploading anything that isn’t double-encrypted with VC and Cryptomator.Īssuming I encrypt files with VC first, and use Cryptomator to encrypt again and upload to Google…I’m thinking Cryptomator might be unnecessary. I will probably use either Dropbox or Google as my cloud provider. That may seem redundant to some but that’s just how I want to do it. Even if I use cryptomator, I will first encrypt using VC. I rely on VeraCrypt as my first line of defense with encryption. However I question it’s usefulness for my particular case. I’ve done a bit of research about cryptomator and I like it.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |